Travis Kelce has given a playful sign that he and Taylor Swift are already thinking about changing their last names after marriage.

The 36-year-old NFL star “liked” an Instagram post on Tuesday from the podcast Bussin With the Boys, in which hosts Will Compton and Taylor Lewan discussed whether Swift would take Kelce’s last name after they tie the knot.

A guest on the show pointed out that Swift is “way more globally famous” than Kelce, suggesting that Kelce might be the one to change his name. The hosts jokingly agreed that “Travis Swift” sounded fitting, while also noting that “Taylor Kelce” worked well. They eventually settled on the idea of hyphenating their surnames.

“No, you gotta go Swift-Kelce — Travis Swift-Kelce,” they said enthusiastically.

Fans were delighted by Kelce’s decision to like the post. One commenter wrote, “Travis liking this is hilarious 😂😂 that’s why he’s perfect for her.” Another added, “Love that Travis liked this video 😂😍.”

Kelce proposed to Swift in August 2025 after two years of dating. A source told Page Six that the couple is expected to wed this summer in New York City.

The pair has not shied away from public appearances in the lead-up to their wedding. On Saturday, they attended a Knicks game in New York, where Kelce — an Ohio native — was loudly cheering for his hometown Cleveland Cavaliers. Although the Cavaliers lost, Kelce appeared to be in high spirits, at one point shotgunning a beer courtside while Swift covered her face in amusement.

With their wedding just weeks away, matrimonial lawyer Sarah Luetto, a partner in Blank Rome’s Matrimonial & Family Law Group, spoke exclusively with Page Six about what a potential prenuptial agreement between the couple might involve.

They could be barred from discussing details of their marriage under a prenuptial non-disclosure agreement — although Swift, 36, would likely retain the right to sing about their relationship.

“Swift and Kelce may wish to include terms fostering confidentiality and privacy,” Luetto, who does not represent either party, told Page Six. “This may include non-disparagement or non-disclosure terms related to their relationship.”

“In Taylor’s case, she would likely not want to include provisions limiting her from singing about her relationship in songs, particularly since there is always so much speculation about the subjects of her songwriting,” she added.