The investigation into the disappearance of Lily and Jack Sullivan has increasingly focused on digital evidence, as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police examines a series of Google searches allegedly made from within the Sullivan household in the 72 hours before the children were reported missing.

Investigators have not publicly identified who conducted the searches, nor have they announced any conclusions. However, police sources confirm the queries are being reviewed as part of a broader effort to reconstruct events leading up to the disappearance.

According to information being examined, the searches included highly specific questions: how long children can survive in freezing temperatures; how police conduct searches for missing persons; and what mistakes criminals make that lead to capture. Investigators say the timing and subject matter warrant closer scrutiny.

Authorities stress that internet searches alone do not establish guilt. Digital activity must be assessed in context — alongside timelines, device access, and corroborating evidence. Still, experts note that when queries are both time-specific and operational in nature, they can provide insight into intent or state of mind

The RCMP has not disclosed which device was used, whether searches were made on a phone or computer, or whether multiple users had access. Investigators are analyzing metadata, timestamps, IP information, and usage patterns to determine when and how the searches occurred.

Digital forensics specialists explain that modern investigations often rely on such analysis to establish chronology. Searches can indicate curiosity, anxiety, or preparation — and distinguishing among those possibilities requires careful evaluation.

In this case, the searches are being placed against a tight timeline. Investigators have identified the 72-hour window before the disappearance as critical, a period during which several other elements are also under review, including movements, witness statements, and vehicle activity.

Police have emphasized that the phrasing of the queries is as important as their existence. Questions about survival in freezing temperatures, for example, suggest a focus on environmental exposure. Queries about police search methods and criminal mistakes point toward awareness of investigative processes.

However, authorities caution against jumping to conclusions. People search the internet for many reasons, and not all research indicates wrongdoing. The RCMP has said the purpose of the review is to understand context — not to label intent prematurely.

As part of the analysis, investigators are comparing the digital timeline with known events, such as reported sleep periods, neighbor observations, and the timing of when the children were last seen. Any discrepancies will be examined further.

The investigation has also considered device ownership and access. If multiple people used the same device, determining authorship becomes more complex. Police are therefore looking at usage habits, account logins, and location data to narrow possibilities.

Digital evidence has increasingly played a decisive role in missing-person cases. Experts say it can corroborate or challenge narratives, reveal planning or panic, and sometimes contradict statements made later.

In previous updates, RCMP officials have indicated that the case has shifted from broad searching to focused case-building. The review of internet searches aligns with that shift, reflecting a methodical effort to piece together actions and decisions during the critical period.

Names mentioned in connection with the case, including Malehya Brooks-Murray and Daniel Martell, have not been charged. Police have not stated who made the searches and have emphasized that all individuals referenced remain part of an investigation, not accused of crimes.

The RCMP reiterated that digital findings are one component among many. Physical evidence, witness testimony, and forensic results will ultimately determine the direction of the case.

For the public, the revelation that investigators are examining such searches underscores how digital footprints can become central in modern investigations. What once seemed private or routine can later take on significance when placed within a broader timeline.

As the investigation continues, RCMP officials have asked for patience and restraint. They say updates will be provided when information can be confirmed and shared responsibly.

What remains clear is that the digital trail — including internet searches made shortly before the disappearance — is now a key area of focus. Investigators are working to determine what those searches mean, who made them, and how they fit into the events that unfolded before Lily and Jack Sullivan vanished.