🚨 DOWNING STREET SIEGE: Starmer “RUNNING SCARED” as THOUSANDS storm Number 10 demanding WAR on Iran’s terror regime – but the PM’s lips are SEALED tight! 😱

Chaos erupts with flags waving, chants for freedom, and protesters blasting Starmer for ignoring bloodshed to shield his “special voter base” while Trump vows to BOMB Iran into oblivion if they touch one more demonstrator. Experts warn his silence is gambling with British lives… but what’s the REAL dirty secret behind No.10’s blackout? This could EXPLODE into global crisis – click to see the shocking footage and why Starmer’s terrified! 🔥🇬🇧

Thousands of demonstrators converged outside No. 10 Downing Street over the weekend of January 10-11, 2026, in a show of solidarity with anti-government protesters in Iran, amplifying calls for British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to take decisive action against Tehran’s regime. The rally, organized by groups including Stop the Hate UK and the Iranian Committee for Freedom, featured chants for regime change, pre-revolutionary Iranian flags, and demands to proscribe the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization. Protesters accused Starmer of silence amid escalating violence in Iran, suggesting his reluctance stems from fears of alienating key voter demographics, particularly Muslim communities that form a significant part of Labour’s support base. Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, U.S. President Donald Trump has escalated rhetoric, threatening military intervention and imposing tariffs on nations trading with Iran, raising questions about potential risks to British interests and lives.

The protests in London were part of a global wave of demonstrations supporting Iran’s uprising, which erupted in late December 2025 over economic grievances but quickly morphed into broader demands for regime change. Human rights groups report hundreds killed in the crackdown, with Iranian security forces, including the IRGC, accused of using lethal force against unarmed civilians. In London, an estimated 3,000 to 5,000 people gathered, marching from the Iranian Embassy to Downing Street. Participants waved the “Lion and Sun” flag—a symbol of pre-1979 Iran—and voiced support for Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of the last Shah. Organizers framed the event as a direct challenge to Starmer, citing his background as a human rights lawyer and urging him to apply those principles by designating the IRGC a terrorist group and bolstering support for Iranian dissidents.

Downing Street’s response has been measured but criticized as insufficient. On January 9, 2026, Starmer joined French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in a joint declaration expressing “deep concern” over reports of violence by Iranian authorities. The statement condemned the killing of protesters, urged restraint, and called for the upholding of fundamental rights like freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. A Downing Street spokesperson reiterated Starmer’s support for peaceful protesters during a call with another leader, emphasizing the need for close international coordination. However, when pressed on proscribing the IRGC, officials downplayed the prospect, noting that such designations are typically reserved for domestic terror groups rather than foreign state entities. They highlighted existing sanctions against Iran and ongoing efforts to apply international pressure.

Critics from across the political spectrum have seized on this as evidence of Starmer’s hesitation. Conservative Leader Kemi Badenoch penned a letter to the Prime Minister, arguing that if the Iranian regime falls, the UK cannot become a “sanctuary for enforcers of repression.” She described the regime as one that “brutalizes women, persecutes gay people, and spreads terror around the world.” Former Home Secretary Dame Priti Patel echoed this on GB News, calling the IRGC a “threat to our national security” and slamming Starmer’s “failure to comment” as emblematic of Labour’s weakness. Reform UK figures and commentators like Mahyar Tousi have gone further, accusing Starmer of prioritizing electoral calculations over moral clarity. Tousi pointed out the silence from left-leaning figures like former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, suggesting “human rights” are selectively applied when allies are involved.

The voter base angle has fueled much of the controversy. Labour’s 2024 election victory relied heavily on support from Muslim communities, particularly in urban areas where issues like Gaza and Middle East policy played a role. Critics argue Starmer’s government is “terrified” of alienating this group, especially given past tensions over Labour’s recognition of Palestine and perceived softness on Islamist extremism. One X post from user @RachelA1892 highlighted Starmer’s “damning” silence, contrasting it with his Cabinet’s praise for Hamas-linked actions. Another from @Nervana_1 lamented the “defeating” quiet from Western leaders, including Starmer, questioning why unarmed Iranians receive less attention than conflicts like Gaza. Supporters of the Prime Minister counter that his approach is pragmatic, avoiding escalation that could endanger British nationals in the region or strain alliances.

Complicating matters is President Trump’s aggressive posture. As of January 12, 2026, Trump has been briefed on military options, including strikes on nonmilitary sites in Tehran, cyber operations, and expanded sanctions. He has publicly warned Iran’s leaders that the U.S. will “hit them very hard” if protesters are killed, stating on Air Force One that a threshold may have been crossed. Trump imposed a 25% tariff on exports from any country doing business with Iran, aiming to isolate Tehran economically. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News that Trump is “unafraid to use lethal force” but prefers diplomacy first, noting backchannel communications with Iranian officials. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei responded by threatening U.S. and Israeli bases, while President Masoud Pezeshkian blamed foreign interference for the unrest.

Experts warn that Starmer’s perceived inaction could put British lives at risk. The IRGC has been linked to plots against dissidents in the UK, including threats to journalists and activists. A Telegraph report noted cross-party calls to ban the group, with U.S. officials joining the chorus. If Trump proceeds with intervention—potentially airstrikes or support for Israeli actions against Iran’s missile program—Britain could face fallout, including refugee flows, economic disruptions from tariffs, or retaliatory attacks on UK interests in the Middle East. Analysts like those from the Arms Control Association suggest Trump’s threats extend to eradicating any nuclear buildup, heightening tensions. In a CNBC analysis, intervention scenarios range from limited strikes to broader support for regime change, drawing parallels to past U.S. actions in Venezuela.

Public reaction in the UK has been polarized. Social media platforms buzzed with hashtags like #IranRevolution2026 and #StarmerCoward, with users like @Steflex1 questioning Starmer’s silence amid potential threats to British citizens. Protesters at the rally, including Jewish and Iranian communities, emphasized unity against repression, with one organizer telling the Jewish Chronicle, “We won’t forget who stood by us.” Jewish groups highlighted Iran’s links to Hamas and Hezbollah, framing the IRGC ban as essential for UK security. Conversely, some Labour supporters defend Starmer’s multilateral approach, pointing to the joint European statement as evidence of coordinated diplomacy rather than unilateral bombast.

The episode underscores broader challenges for Starmer’s administration, now six months into its term. Domestically, approval ratings have dipped amid economic pressures, and foreign policy missteps could exacerbate divisions. Internationally, aligning with Trump’s hardline stance risks alienating European partners who favor restraint. As one Times report noted, Starmer believes proscribing the IRGC would have “no effect,” opting instead for sanctions and dialogue. Yet, with protests in Iran showing no signs of abating—entering their third week—and global demonstrations from Los Angeles to Paris amplifying the call, pressure on Downing Street mounts.

Whether Starmer’s caution proves prescient or perilous remains unclear. For now, the siege outside No. 10 symbolizes a flashpoint in UK politics: a clash between populist demands for bold action and a government’s preference for measured response. As Trump mulls strikes and Tehran digs in, British lives—both at home and abroad—hang in the balance, with critics arguing silence equates to complicity in the face of tyranny.