🚨 COMMONS MASSACRE: Reform’s Lee Anderson GOES NUCLEAR – Brands Labour MPs “TRAITORS” in Savage Takedown! 🚨

The House of Commons just witnessed pure political CARNAGE as Lee Anderson unleashed the most brutal speech of the year – straight-up calling Labour benches TRAITORS to the British people!

In a fiery Westminster Hall debate on calls for a snap election, Anderson ripped into Keir Starmer’s government, accusing them of betraying working-class voters while the country crumbles. Then came the killer line: Birmingham – Labour’s heartland – is now a “hellhole” overrun with rubbish piles and rats the size of small dogs feasting on the streets!

The Labour side? Stunned silence. Anderson didn’t hold back: streets filling with criminals, broken promises everywhere, and only the rats getting “better off” under this lot!

Read more:

Reform UK MP Lee Anderson delivered a scathing attack on the Labour government during a Westminster Hall debate on January 12, 2026, branding opposition benches as “all traitors” and painting a grim picture of urban decay in Birmingham, where he claimed streets were littered with rubbish and infested with “rats the size of small dogs.”

The debate centered on an e-petition calling for a general election, reflecting public discontent with the Labour administration’s first 18 months in power. Anderson, a former Conservative deputy chairman who defected to Reform UK in 2024, used his time to dismantle what he described as Labour’s failures on crime, immigration, cost of living, and public services.

In excerpts widely shared online, Anderson stated that Labour had betrayed working people, allowing streets to “fill up with criminals” while governance faltered. He singled out Birmingham – a major Labour stronghold – as emblematic of broader decline, saying it was “filling up with rubbish as well” with “rats the size of small dogs roaming around… feasting on” the waste. He quipped that under Labour, “the only ones better off” were the city’s rodents.

The remarks drew immediate attention on social media and right-leaning outlets, with video clips from the session amassing significant views on YouTube and platforms like GB News. Titles such as “Reform MP RIPS APART Labour MPs in powerful speech: ‘ALL TRAITORS!’” highlighted the confrontational tone, showing Anderson gesturing emphatically toward the government side.

Labour MPs and supporters condemned the language as inflammatory and unparliamentary. Critics argued Anderson’s rhetoric exaggerated isolated issues to score political points, pointing out that Birmingham, like many UK cities, faces challenges from budget cuts, post-pandemic recovery, and bin collection disputes – including ongoing strikes by refuse workers that have led to visible street rubbish in parts of the city. Local council officials have acknowledged temporary service disruptions but rejected claims of widespread infestation or collapse.

Anderson’s defection and outspoken style have made him a polarizing figure. He has faced previous controversies, including a 2023 suspension from the Conservative whip over comments on London Mayor Sadiq Khan. Since joining Reform UK, he has positioned himself as a champion of “common sense” politics, frequently criticizing Labour on issues like immigration and law and order.

The speech occurred amid heightened political tensions. Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage, has gained polling traction by capitalizing on voter frustration with both major parties. Recent surveys show Reform polling in double digits nationally, drawing support from disaffected Conservatives and some former Labour voters in working-class areas. Anderson’s intervention in the e-petition debate – which garnered tens of thousands of signatures – amplified calls for an early election, though Labour holds a strong majority from 2024.

Public reaction split sharply. On X and Facebook, supporters praised Anderson for “speaking truth” and representing overlooked communities, with comments like “Finally someone says it!” trending alongside clips. Detractors accused him of fearmongering and classing entire cities unfairly, noting Birmingham’s economic contributions and diversity. Some pointed to improvements in certain crime categories under national policing efforts, though knife crime and antisocial behavior remain concerns in urban centers.

Birmingham City Council has dealt with bin strikes and waste management issues, exacerbated by industrial action over pay and conditions. Images of piled rubbish bags have circulated in media, fueling local complaints. However, environmental health officers have not reported citywide rat infestations on the scale suggested, describing problems as localized and manageable through routine pest control.

Anderson’s “traitors” accusation echoed broader Reform messaging that Labour prioritizes other agendas over British workers. In the speech, he linked perceived failures to betrayal of the electorate’s 2024 mandate, arguing the government had abandoned promises on growth, security, and living standards.

No formal disciplinary action followed the remarks, though Westminster Hall debates allow more latitude than the main chamber. The Deputy Speaker oversaw proceedings without interruption, though such strong language often draws scrutiny under parliamentary rules on courtesy.

The episode highlights deepening polarization in UK politics. Reform UK continues to press Labour on perceived weaknesses, while the government defends its record on economic stabilization, NHS waiting lists, and green initiatives. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has dismissed Reform as fringe, focusing criticism on Conservative legacy issues.

For Birmingham residents, the comments stung. Community leaders emphasized resilience and ongoing regeneration projects, rejecting blanket characterizations. One local councillor told media the city faces real challenges but is “far from a hellhole,” pointing to cultural vibrancy and investment.

Anderson’s speech, while inflammatory to some, resonated with those feeling ignored by Westminster. As Reform builds momentum ahead of potential local elections or by-elections, such moments could define its appeal to disillusioned voters.

Whether the rhetoric translates to electoral gains remains uncertain. Polling shows Reform competitive in certain seats, but major parties retain structural advantages. The debate underscored ongoing public anxiety over urban decay, public services, and trust in government – issues unlikely to fade soon.