Newly reviewed documents from the investigation into the disappearance of Lily Sullivan and Jack Sullivan confirm a series of documented household stressors that existed months before the children vanished in May 2025. Investigators emphasize that no criminal charges have been filed, no suspects have been identified, and no causal conclusions have been drawn. However, authorities have acknowledged that these details remain relevant to the ongoing investigation.

According to official records, the children’s stepfather, Daniel Martell, acknowledged past drug use during interviews with investigators. The records do not specify which substances were involved or when the use occurred. Investigators have stated that the admission alone did not result in criminal charges and remains one element among many under review.

The documents also note multiple reports in which the children were observed with black eyes on separate occasions. Different explanations were reportedly provided for these injuries at different times. Authorities have not concluded that abuse occurred, and no charges related to child abuse have been filed.

In addition, the children’s mother, Malehya Brooks-Murray, previously alleged that Martell engaged in controlling and physically restrictive behavior within the relationship. Martell publicly denied these claims, characterizing the incidents as typical relationship disagreements. No domestic violence charges were filed in connection with these allegations.

Financial stress was also documented within the household. Records indicate the family experienced reduced income after Martell’s work hours at a sawmill were cut. Investigators have not stated that financial strain played a direct role in the children’s disappearance but confirmed it is part of the broader context being examined.

Perhaps most notably, a provincial child protection social worker visited the home months before the children went missing to investigate a report of suspected abuse or neglect. Following that visit, the children remained in the home, indicating the investigation did not result in removal or immediate protective action.

Authorities stress that such visits do not, on their own, imply wrongdoing and are common in cases where concerns are reported but not substantiated to the threshold required for removal.

In the aftermath of the disappearance, both parents voluntarily participated in multiple polygraph examinations administered by investigators. Officials have confirmed that both passed those tests. Law enforcement has repeatedly cautioned that polygraph results are not definitive proof of innocence or guilt but are one of many investigative tools.

At this time, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police has stated clearly that no suspects have been identified and that the relevance of the documented household stressors remains under review. Investigators say there is no established causal connection between these factors and the children’s disappearance.

“The investigation remains open,” authorities have said, emphasizing that all information is being assessed carefully and without assumptions.

Legal experts note that the release or confirmation of such details often leads to public speculation, but caution that documentation of stressors does not equate to criminal responsibility. Many families experience similar challenges without any criminal outcome.

For investigators, the focus remains on finding Lily and Jack. Every detail — whether it ultimately proves relevant or not — is being preserved as part of a comprehensive effort to understand the circumstances surrounding their disappearance.

As the case continues, authorities urge the public to avoid drawing conclusions and to rely only on confirmed information. Until evidence establishes otherwise, no individual has been charged, no theory has been confirmed, and the investigation remains ongoing.