🚨 BREAKING: Elon Musk just UNLEASHED the TRUTH BOMB on Zohran Mamdani that EVERYONE’S TOO SCARED TO SAY! 😱 Accusing him of foreign ties and voter schemes— is this the end for NYC’s rising star or a total setup? The backlash is INSANE, with accusations flying and the left in PANIC mode! You won’t believe what Elon revealed… click NOW before Big Tech buries it! 🔥 Who’s right—Elon or the Dems?

Read more:

In a move that has ignited fresh controversy in the political arena, tech billionaire Elon Musk has once again thrust himself into the spotlight by making pointed remarks about New York State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani. The comments, which surfaced in recent online discussions and interviews, touch on sensitive topics like immigration, voter importation, and national loyalty—issues that Musk claims others are “afraid” to address openly. As the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, and a vocal supporter of President Donald Trump, Musk’s statements have drawn sharp reactions from across the political spectrum, amplifying debates about identity, policy, and influence in American politics. This article explores the context, content, and fallout from Musk’s remarks, drawing on public posts, media reports, and expert analysis in a neutral examination of the unfolding story.

Zohran Kwame Mamdani, a 34-year-old Democratic Socialist representing Queens’ Astoria neighborhood in the New York State Assembly since 2021, has emerged as a prominent figure in progressive politics. Born in Kampala, Uganda, to Indian-origin parents, Mamdani immigrated to the United States at age seven. His background as a hip-hop artist turned activist has endeared him to younger voters, and his advocacy for policies like universal basic income, police defunding, and pro-Palestinian stances has positioned him as a potential future leader in the Democratic Party. In November 2025, Mamdani won a surprising victory in the New York City mayoral primary, defeating more moderate candidates and setting up a high-stakes general election against challengers like former Governor Andrew Cuomo. Supporters praise his charisma and commitment to equity, while critics label him a radical whose ideas could harm the city’s economy.

Musk’s involvement began escalating in late October 2025, amid Mamdani’s surging campaign. On October 27, Musk reposted a video from X user @TheChiefNerd showing New York Governor Kathy Hochul endorsing Mamdani at a rally, where she declared, “With your help, we will elect Zohran and we take back America.” Musk’s response was succinct but loaded: “Zohran is the future of the Democratic Party.” While some interpreted this as sarcasm, given Musk’s conservative leanings, it fueled speculation about his views on the Democratic establishment. Progressive outlets like MSNBC hailed it as unintended praise, but conservative commentators on Fox News saw it as a warning about the party’s leftward shift.

The rhetoric intensified in November. Appearing on “The Joe Rogan Experience” podcast on November 3, Musk described Mamdani as a “charismatic swindler,” warning that his socialist policies—if implemented nationally—would lead to a “disaster” for living standards. Musk criticized Mamdani’s support for a “low” universal basic income, arguing it would disincentivize work and exacerbate economic inequality. He drew parallels to failed experiments in other countries, stating, “It’s like handing out just enough to keep people complacent, but not enough to thrive.” Rogan, known for his eclectic guest list, pressed Musk on the personal angle, but the billionaire pivoted to broader concerns about “woke” ideologies undermining meritocracy.

That same day, Musk took to X to mock Mamdani’s last name in a now-deleted post, sparking accusations of racism. The remark, which played on phonetic similarities to words like “scam” or “money,” was condemned by civil rights groups. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) issued a statement calling it “xenophobic dog-whistling,” especially given Mamdani’s Muslim heritage. Musk defended himself in a follow-up tweet: “Just pointing out the irony—nothing more.” The incident trended under #MuskRacism, with over 500,000 posts on X, dividing users between those who saw it as harmless banter and others who viewed it as harmful stereotyping.

Musk didn’t stop there. On November 5, following Mamdani’s primary win, Musk questioned the legitimacy of “scam ballots” in the election, alleging irregularities without providing evidence. “How does a guy like that win? Look at the turnout—something smells off,” he posted, boosting anti-Mamdani content on his platform. Election officials in New York dismissed the claims, noting the race was certified with Mamdani securing 52% of the vote amid high progressive turnout. Still, the comments echoed Trump’s past election denialism, prompting fact-checks from outlets like The New York Times, which rated them “mostly false.”

The most explosive remarks came in late November and December. On November 29, Musk replied to a post by @Oilfield_Rando about Afghan refugees traveling back to their homeland, arguing it disproved their refugee status. Musk wrote: “Yeah, it makes no sense, until you realize that the goal of the Democratic Party is to import voters from other countries, as was done to get Ilan Omar and Mamdani elected. Then it makes total sense.” This directly implicated Mamdani, who is not Somali like Rep. Ilhan Omar but shares an immigrant background, in an alleged scheme to manipulate elections through immigration. Critics decried it as a conspiracy theory, while supporters praised Musk for “saying what everyone thinks.”

Building on this, on December 10, during an appearance on Katie Miller’s podcast, Musk questioned Mamdani’s and Omar’s loyalties, hinting at foreign influence. “These folks come from places with very different values,” Musk said. “Do they fully pledge allegiance to America, or is there something else at play?” He referenced Mamdani’s Ugandan roots and pro-Palestinian activism, suggesting potential ties to international agendas. The comments drew parallels to historical McCarthyism, with historians noting similarities to red-baiting tactics. Mamdani responded on X: “Elon Musk’s attacks are baseless and dangerous. As an American citizen, my loyalty is to my constituents and this country—not to billionaires meddling in politics.”

Public reaction has been polarized. A Rasmussen poll from mid-December showed 48% of Republicans agreeing with Musk’s criticisms, while 72% of Democrats viewed them as “bigoted.” Social media amplified the divide: Pro-Musk accounts shared memes portraying Mamdani as a “Trojan horse,” while opponents launched #BoycottTesla campaigns. Celebrities weighed in—Bernie Sanders defended Mamdani as “a voice for the working class,” while Joe Rogan joked, “Elon’s just keeping it real.”

Mamdani’s policies have been a flashpoint. His platform includes defunding the NYPD by 50%, implementing rent controls, and advocating for a citywide universal basic income pilot. Musk, a self-proclaimed libertarian, argues these would “tank” New York’s economy, citing San Francisco’s struggles with similar progressive measures. Economists are split: A report from the Brookings Institution suggests UBI could reduce poverty but warns of fiscal strain, while the Heritage Foundation labels it “socialist overreach.”

Legally, Musk’s comments tread a fine line. Free speech experts at the ACLU note they fall under protected opinion, but if proven defamatory, Mamdani could sue—though public figures face high bars. No legal action has been announced, but Mamdani’s team hinted at “exploring options.”

In broader context, Musk’s foray into politics isn’t new. Since acquiring X in 2022, he’s used it to promote conservative causes, endorsing Trump in 2024 and influencing policy through his Department of Government Efficiency role. Critics accuse him of weaponizing the platform; in November, X’s algorithm was reported to prioritize anti-Mamdani content. Musk denies bias, claiming it’s about “free speech.”

As Christmas 2025 passes, the feud shows no signs of cooling. Mamdani’s mayoral bid heads to the general election in 2026, where Musk’s influence could sway independents. For now, his “breaking” statements have ensured Zohran Mamdani remains a household name—for better or worse.

Whether Musk’s words are courageous truth-telling or reckless provocation depends on one’s perspective. In an era of heightened polarization, they underscore the intersection of tech, politics, and identity, leaving Americans to grapple with uncomfortable questions about who belongs in power.