🚨 TAXPAYER MONEY WASTED ON EMPTY HOTELS? 😡🇬🇧 Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe just went FULL NUCLEAR in a savage grilling of Home Office bosses – accusing them of HIDING THE TRUTH about asylum hotels booked solid but running at HALF CAPACITY! 🤯

He slammed senior civil servants over redacted contracts worth BILLIONS, where entire hotels are paid for taxpayer cash… yet rooms sit empty while Brits struggle!

Read more:

Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe has intensified scrutiny of the Home Office’s asylum accommodation program, focusing on allegations of inefficiency and lack of transparency in contracts for hotel usage. During a January 2026 session of the Public Accounts Committee, Lowe questioned senior civil servants, including Home Office official Simon Ridley, over what he described as taxpayer-funded waste in housing asylum seekers in hotels that operate below full capacity.

The exchange highlighted ongoing concerns about the costs and management of asylum support, which has drawn criticism from opposition figures amid a reported backlog exceeding 100,000 cases. Lowe referenced evidence suggesting that some hotels, fully booked and paid for under long-term contracts, were running at roughly half occupancy. He argued this represented poor value for money, with private contractors potentially profiting excessively while essential details remained redacted in public documents.

In his line of questioning, Lowe pressed for greater openness on contract specifics, including services provided such as healthcare, transportation, recreational activities, and laundry. He cited whistleblower information indicating these extras contributed to high per-person costs, with overall asylum support spending reaching around £4 billion in 2024-25, including £2.7 billion on accommodation. Lowe described the redactions as unacceptable, preventing proper parliamentary oversight and public accountability.

Civil servants defended the arrangements, noting that contracts were structured to ensure availability during fluctuating arrivals and processing times. They emphasized efforts to reduce hotel usage by shifting to alternative sites, such as former military facilities, and processing claims more efficiently. The Home Office has committed to phasing out hotels where possible, with numbers dropping from a peak of around 400 under the previous administration to under 200 recently. However, occupancy data showed fluctuations, with around 35,000-36,000 asylum seekers in hotels as of late 2025, sometimes leading to underutilization in specific locations due to dispersal policies or case resolutions.

Lowe’s intervention built on his repeated parliamentary questions and public statements calling for full publication of contract details. In social media posts and committee appearances, he highlighted concerns over “obscene profits” for providers like Serco, Mears, and Clearsprings, pointing to reported increases in contractor earnings tied to cost-plus models during high hotel usage periods. He argued that fixed payments for entire hotels, regardless of actual occupancy, risked inefficiency if numbers fell short.

The Home Office has maintained that contracts balance flexibility with cost control, and that transparency is limited in some areas to protect commercial sensitivities and operational security. Responses to written questions from Lowe and others have sometimes cited insufficient granularity in data collection, though recent disclosures—prompted by parliamentary pressure—revealed major contractors and charity partners involved in delivering services.

Broader context includes Labour government pledges to end reliance on hotels, with plans to accelerate processing, increase returns, and utilize sites like former RAF bases. Ministers have reported progress in reducing daily hotel costs from peaks of £8-9 million to lower figures through these shifts. However, critics like Lowe contend that long-term commitments—some extending to 2029—lock in expenses unnecessarily, especially if occupancy remains inconsistent.

Official statistics indicate asylum accommodation remains a significant budgetary item, with the Office for Budget Responsibility revising estimates upward to £15.2 billion over the next decade for related costs. This reflects challenges in managing arrivals, backlogs, and legal processes, including appeals that extend stays. The government has emphasized humanitarian obligations under international law while pursuing reforms to deter irregular crossings.

Lowe’s approach aligns with Reform UK’s platform, which advocates stricter controls, rapid deportations, and ending what he terms preferential treatment for asylum seekers over domestic needs. He has called for secure detention facilities and swift removals, arguing current systems encourage abuse and strain public resources.

Supporters of the current framework point to the complexities of asylum processing, where individuals must be housed while claims are assessed to prevent destitution. Alternatives like barges or barracks have faced legal and logistical hurdles, and community tensions in hosting areas have prompted protests and local authority concerns.

The Public Accounts Committee session underscored partisan divides on immigration policy. Conservative and Reform figures have amplified Lowe’s points, framing them as evidence of fiscal mismanagement under Labour. Government responses stress ongoing reductions in hotel numbers and improved efficiency, with ministers like Alex Norris addressing related Commons questions on closures and cost savings.

Lowe has used multiple channels—parliamentary questions, committee scrutiny, and public appeals—to demand unredacted disclosures. In one instance, he highlighted a £235 million charity contract revealed through pressure, questioning value and oversight. He has also linked the issue to national security and public trust, suggesting hidden details fuel perceptions of waste.

For the Home Office, the challenge involves balancing transparency with practical constraints. Civil servants have committed in committee to reviewing publication options, though full details may remain limited. The debate reflects wider tensions over immigration funding amid economic pressures, with taxpayers funding support while domestic services face strains.

Analysts note that hotel usage, while costly, was a temporary measure during backlog peaks. Efforts to transition to cheaper, purpose-built accommodation continue, but progress depends on processing speeds and returns rates. Recent data shows increases in arrests and removals, though critics argue these fall short of addressing root causes.

Lowe’s persistent questioning has kept the issue in the spotlight, resonating with voters concerned about costs and accountability. Whether it leads to policy changes or greater disclosures remains uncertain, but it highlights accountability challenges in large-scale public contracts.

In a politically charged environment, such exchanges serve as proxies for broader debates on borders, spending priorities, and governance. For now, the Home Office continues operations under existing frameworks while facing calls for reform from figures like Lowe.