🚨 “SORRY, ALL OUT OF MERCY!” – James Bulger’s Brother Ralph Declares WAR on Jon Venables’ Latest Freedom Bid! 😡💔

As Jon Venables gears up for another Parole Board hearing in 2026 — his chance to walk free after repeated terrible crimes — James’s brother Ralph Bulger is uniting outraged Brits in a fierce fight to keep the “monster” locked up for good.

Ralph vows: No more second chances. No forgiveness. He’s standing firm for justice, vowing to attend the hearing and speak out against any release. The nation is rallying behind the Bulger family after 32+ years of pain.

Full details:

More than three decades after the brutal 1993 murder of 2-year-old James Bulger shocked the world, his killer Jon Venables is once again before the Parole Board in a hearing that has reignited raw grief for the victim’s family and sparked widespread public fury. James’s father, Ralph Bulger, has publicly declared “no mercy” for Venables, vowing to fight any bid for freedom and uniting citizens across the nation in calls for the 43-year-old to remain incarcerated.

Venables, who was 10 when he and accomplice Robert Thompson abducted, tortured, and murdered James in Bootle, Merseyside, has been in and out of prison since his initial release on licence in 2001. He was recalled twice — in 2010 and 2017 — after being convicted of possessing indecent images of children, including a “paedophile manual” and over 1,100 unlawful photos and videos in the latter case. In 2023, the Parole Board rejected his previous application, concluding he still posed a “danger to children” and could reoffend, citing ongoing concerns about his sexual preoccupation and lack of full honesty with probation officers.

The latest development came in January 2026, when the Parole Board confirmed an oral hearing for Venables’ fresh bid for release — more than two years after the 2023 denial. The family was notified earlier this month, with the hearing expected sometime in the coming months, though no exact date has been set. James’s mother, Denise Fergus, was granted permission to observe the proceedings, a move she described as reopening “unimaginable trauma.” A spokesperson for Fergus said the process forces the family to confront uncertainty and distress once more.

Ralph Bulger, James’s father, has been vocal in his opposition. Speaking to The Sun, he expressed determination to attend the hearing to hear Venables speak — something he has not done in 32 years — and to stand “for my son James, for my enduring love for him, for justice for him and in defiance of Jon Venables.” He called the upcoming review a “kick in the guts” for the family, especially as it approaches the anniversary of James’s abduction and murder in February. Ralph has labeled Venables a “monster” and insists he will never forgive the killer, emphasizing that releasing him would endanger children.

The Bulger family’s stance has resonated widely. Public sentiment remains overwhelmingly against Venables’ release, with online discussions, petitions, and media coverage amplifying calls for him to serve his full sentence or face indefinite detention. Supporters argue that Venables’ repeated offenses demonstrate a failure of rehabilitation, despite years of therapy and assessments in prison. Critics of the parole system question why someone with such a history is given multiple opportunities for freedom.

Venables and Thompson were originally detained at Her Majesty’s pleasure after their 1993 conviction, serving eight years in a secure unit before being released on licence in 2001 with new identities for lifelong anonymity. Thompson has not reoffended publicly since and is believed to be living quietly. Venables, however, has struggled with compliance, leading to his recalls. The Parole Board has previously noted that while Venables completed “considerable work” to address his offending, risks persist.

The case continues to highlight tensions in Britain’s approach to juvenile offenders who commit serious crimes. The original trial drew international attention for the young age of the perpetrators and the horrific nature of the crime — James was lured from a shopping center, taken on a two-mile walk, battered with bricks and an iron bar, and left on railway tracks. The killers were among the youngest ever convicted of murder in the UK.

Public outrage has persisted through the years, fueled by Venables’ breaches and the protected identity that makes monitoring difficult. The Bulger family has campaigned tirelessly, with Denise Fergus establishing the James Bulger Memorial Trust to support child safety initiatives. Ralph has also spoken out repeatedly, stressing the lifelong impact on James’s siblings and extended family.

The Parole Board’s process involves reviewing reports from prison staff, psychiatrists, probation officers, and victim impact statements. In 2023, the panel’s decision cited Venables’ ongoing issues as justification for denial. This time, the oral hearing allows direct questioning, which the family hopes will expose any remaining risks.

Legal experts note that parole decisions prioritize public protection. If granted release, Venables would likely face strict licence conditions, including monitoring and restrictions on contact with children. However, past recalls suggest challenges in sustaining compliance outside prison.

The Bulger family’s fight has garnered support from politicians, campaigners, and ordinary citizens who view Venables’ history as evidence he should never be freed. Petitions and social media campaigns echo Ralph’s sentiment of “no mercy,” arguing that justice for James demands permanent incarceration.

As the hearing approaches, the nation watches closely. For the Bulger family, it’s another painful chapter in a tragedy that never fully heals. Denise Fergus has spoken of her “deepest fear” that Venables could one day walk free, while Ralph remains resolute: he will not rest until justice prevails.

Whether the Parole Board will grant release or extend detention remains uncertain. What is clear is the enduring pain for James’s loved ones and the public’s determination to honor his memory by prioritizing child safety. The outcome could redefine debates over rehabilitation, anonymity, and lifelong consequences for heinous crimes committed in childhood.