New and deeply unsettling details have emerged in the case involving Jack and Lilly Sullivan after their paternal grandmother gave a candid interview shedding light on troubling moments, emotional reactions, and unanswered questions surrounding the children’s disappearance.

In the interview, the grandmother speaks openly about her interactions with key individuals connected to the case, including her first meeting with Daniel Martell, her observations of Malehya Brooks-Murray, and the sequence of events that continue to trouble the family.

Her account does not offer conclusions — but it raises serious concerns.

A Grandmother Breaks Her Silence

For the first time publicly, the grandmother of Jack and Lilly Sullivan detailed what she describes as a series of moments that felt “off” from the very beginning.

She explained that her decision to speak out was not motivated by blame, but by a need for clarity — and by the weight of unanswered questions that continue to haunt the family.

“These are things that don’t leave your mind,” she said. “Especially when children are missing.”

Meeting Daniel Martell: An Emotional Encounter

One of the most emotional moments described in the interview was her meeting with Daniel Martell.

According to the grandmother, Martell’s reaction stood out immediately. She described him as visibly overwhelmed and deeply emotional — a response she says contrasted sharply with others involved.

Later, she learned that Martell’s own mother had to be informed that police were preparing to obtain a search warrant, a moment that reportedly intensified emotions within the family.

The grandmother emphasized that these reactions are not accusations — but they are details she believes matter.

Malehya’s Emotions — Or Lack Thereof

Perhaps the most striking portion of the interview involved her observations of Malehya Brooks-Murray’s emotional state.

The grandmother stated that she was troubled by what she perceived as a lack of emotion during critical moments. While grief manifests differently for everyone, she described behavior that felt detached and inconsistent with the gravity of the situation.

“She didn’t react the way I expected,” the grandmother said. “It stayed with me.”

She stressed that this perception is based solely on personal observation — not speculation — but acknowledged that it raised red flags in her mind.

Strange Behavior That Raised Questions

Beyond emotional responses, the grandmother also referenced behavior she found unusual.

She described moments that felt disjointed, conversations that seemed evasive, and reactions that did not align with the urgency of children missing under concerning circumstances.

Again, she stopped short of drawing conclusions, but emphasized that these behaviors contributed to her growing unease.

The Sliding Glass Door Detail

One physical detail discussed at length was the sliding glass door.

The grandmother explained that this door became a focal point in discussions about how events may have unfolded. She suggested that questions surrounding whether it was open, closed, or accessed at a critical time remain unresolved.

In cases involving missing children, such environmental details can carry significant weight — not as proof, but as context.

Children in the Woods: A Troubling Possibility

Another moment in the interview that drew attention was the mention of the children potentially being in the woods.

The grandmother did not present this as fact, but as a scenario that was discussed and considered — one that added to the emotional strain and fear surrounding the case.

The idea that young children could be alone in a wooded area intensified concerns and reinforced the urgency of the search efforts.

Police and the Search Warrant Conversation

The interview also revealed that Daniel Martell’s mother had to be informed that law enforcement was preparing to obtain a search warrant.

According to the grandmother, this conversation marked a turning point, signaling that investigators were escalating their approach and treating the situation with increased seriousness.

Law enforcement actions were not framed as accusations, but as necessary steps in a complex and evolving investigation.

A Mother-Son Relationship Under Scrutiny

The grandmother also touched on the relationship between Malehya Brooks-Murray and her son.

She described dynamics that she found concerning, noting interactions that did not align with what she personally considered typical.

Once again, she emphasized that her observations were personal — not professional assessments — but stated that they added to her sense that “something wasn’t right.”

Grief, Confusion, and a Family in Limbo

Throughout the interview, one theme remained constant: confusion.

The grandmother described a family suspended between hope and fear, struggling to reconcile conflicting emotions and fragmented information.

She acknowledged that grief can look different for everyone, but maintained that certain moments continue to trouble her deeply.

Why This Interview Matters

The importance of the grandmother’s interview lies not in definitive answers, but in context.

In cases involving missing children, firsthand observations can provide valuable insight into timelines, behaviors, and interpersonal dynamics — even when they raise more questions than answers.

Her account does not resolve the case, but it underscores why continued attention remains critical.

An Ongoing Search for Truth

As of now, Jack and Lilly Sullivan remain missing, and the investigation continues.

The grandmother’s words add another layer to an already complex case — one marked by emotion, silence, and lingering uncertainty.

For her, speaking out was not about pointing fingers.

It was about making sure no detail — no matter how uncomfortable — is ignored.

Because when children are missing, every detail matters.