New developments are unfolding in Nova Scotia in the ongoing case of missing siblings Lilly, 6, and Jack Sullivan, 4, as Daniel Martell has publicly addressed reports of an alleged party the night before the children disappeared and stated that he passed a polygraph examination. At the same time, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) have renewed search efforts and are appealing to the public for additional surveillance footage that may assist in advancing the investigation. Meanwhile, members of the children’s alleged biological father’s family have begun speaking publicly, adding another dimension to a case that continues to draw significant community attention.

The disappearance of Lilly and Jack has prompted widespread concern across Nova Scotia and beyond. Authorities have not released full details regarding the timeline of events leading up to the children being reported missing, but investigators have confirmed that search operations remain active. In recent days, RCMP officers have expanded their efforts, returning to areas previously canvassed while also reviewing new information that may have surfaced.

Daniel Martell, who has been publicly linked to the household connected to the case, addressed speculation surrounding an alleged gathering or party that reportedly took place the night before the children went missing. Speaking about the claims, Martell stated that he had cooperated with authorities and underwent a polygraph test, which he says he passed. Law enforcement agencies have not independently confirmed the results of any polygraph examination, and officials have not commented publicly on the role such a test may play in the investigation.

Polygraph tests, often referred to as lie detector tests, measure physiological responses such as heart rate, blood pressure, and respiration while a subject answers questions. However, results are generally not admissible in court in many jurisdictions and are typically used as investigative tools rather than definitive proof. Experts frequently caution that while a passed polygraph may influence investigative direction, it does not substitute for corroborated evidence.

The RCMP’s renewed search includes a renewed appeal to residents and businesses in the surrounding area to provide surveillance footage that may capture relevant activity during the critical time window. Authorities are specifically requesting video from doorbell cameras, security systems, or dash cameras that could offer additional insight into movements near the children’s residence or along nearby routes. Investigators have emphasized that even footage that appears routine may contain details useful to the case.

In public statements, law enforcement officials have reiterated that the investigation remains active and that no charges have been announced in connection with the children’s disappearance. The RCMP has urged the public to refrain from speculation and to submit information directly through official channels rather than circulating unverified claims online.

Adding further complexity to the situation, members of the children’s alleged biological father’s family have begun speaking publicly about the case. While specific statements vary, relatives have expressed concern for the children’s safety and have indicated that they are closely following developments. Authorities have not indicated whether the biological father is formally considered a suspect, a person of interest, or a witness, and officials have declined to elaborate on investigative classifications.

Community members have responded to the renewed search with heightened attention. Volunteers have reportedly assisted in distributing information and sharing official updates, though police have cautioned against conducting independent search efforts that could interfere with professional operations. Investigators continue to coordinate ground searches, evidence review, and interviews.

The mention of a party allegedly occurring the night before the children disappeared has drawn public interest, though investigators have not confirmed the relevance of that gathering to the case. In high-profile investigations, peripheral events often generate questions as authorities work to construct a precise timeline. Law enforcement officials have not disclosed whether any attendees of the alleged gathering have been interviewed.

The renewed search effort may indicate that investigators are acting on newly developed leads or reexamining previous information with updated context. In missing children cases, authorities frequently revisit areas multiple times as evidence and tips evolve. RCMP officials have stated that all credible information is being thoroughly assessed.

Public appeals for surveillance footage are common in cases involving narrow timeframes, particularly in residential neighborhoods where private security systems are widespread. Even brief clips showing passing vehicles or pedestrian movement can assist investigators in mapping patterns or identifying inconsistencies in reported accounts.

Legal analysts note that public statements about passing a polygraph can influence public perception but do not necessarily alter investigative processes. Ultimately, authorities rely on physical evidence, digital records, and corroborated testimony to establish facts. The RCMP has not commented on whether any forensic findings have emerged in recent days.

As the case continues, the focus remains on locating Lilly and Jack safely. Officials have emphasized that the priority is determining the children’s whereabouts and ensuring their well-being. The involvement of multiple parties and public statements underscores the complexity of the situation.

Investigators have reiterated that anyone with information, no matter how minor it may seem, should contact law enforcement directly. Authorities are reviewing tips as they are received and have encouraged residents in Nova Scotia to check security systems for footage captured during the relevant timeframe.

For now, many questions remain unanswered. Daniel Martell’s statement regarding the alleged party and the polygraph adds one element to an evolving investigation, while the RCMP’s renewed search signals continued urgency. The reaction from the biological father’s family further highlights the emotional weight of the case.

Law enforcement officials have not provided a timeline for additional updates but have pledged transparency as verified information becomes available. Until more details are released, the disappearance of Lilly and Jack Sullivan remains an active investigation marked by ongoing search efforts, public appeals, and continued community concern.