Investigators examining the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie have identified a series of online searches that occurred in the months leading up to her reported disappearance on February 1, 2026. According to reporting cited by authorities, search records indicate that someone located in Tucson, Arizona searched for Nancy Guthrie’s home address as well as Savannah Guthrie’s salary prior to the date Nancy was last seen.

The searches were identified through digital trend analysis and reporting referenced by Fox News Digital, according to investigators familiar with the review of online activity. While authorities have not publicly named a suspect in connection with the search data, the timing and specificity of the queries have drawn attention.

Digital search history can play a significant role in modern investigations. Law enforcement agencies increasingly analyze online activity to identify patterns, intent, or potential pre-incident behavior. However, experts caution that search data alone does not establish criminal involvement.

The identified searches reportedly originated from within the city of Tucson, Arizona. Officials have not disclosed whether the search activity has been tied to a specific device, individual, or IP address. Instead, the information appears to reflect broader geographic trend data indicating the region where the queries were recorded.

Nancy Guthrie was reported missing on February 1, 2026. In the months preceding that date, according to investigators, searches specifically referencing her home address were logged. Additionally, queries related to Savannah Guthrie’s wage were conducted within the same timeframe and geographic area.

Authorities have not publicly clarified whether the two search topics are believed to be connected or whether they represent separate lines of inquiry. The inclusion of Savannah Guthrie’s salary in the search data has prompted speculation, though officials have not indicated any direct evidentiary link beyond the shared geographic origin of the searches.

Digital forensic analysts note that geographic trend data differs from direct search warrants or device-level extractions. Trend reporting can indicate general regional interest but may not pinpoint an exact individual without additional investigative steps.

Law enforcement agencies often cross-reference digital activity with timeline reconstruction, witness statements, and physical evidence. The timing of these searches — months before Nancy’s disappearance — is being reviewed within the broader context of the case.

Investigators have not confirmed whether the Arizona-based searches represent a breakthrough or merely one data point among many. In complex investigations, online search activity can be relevant, coincidental, or unrelated depending on corroborating evidence.

Public reaction to the reported searches has been swift. Online observers have questioned whether the digital footprint suggests prior knowledge or intent. Authorities, however, caution against drawing conclusions before forensic validation.

The review of digital data is ongoing. Officials have not announced arrests or charges directly connected to the search activity. Instead, they emphasize that the case remains active and that all credible leads are being assessed.

The identification of Tucson as the geographic origin of the searches adds a new dimension to the investigation. Whether it ultimately proves significant will depend on further corroboration, including device tracing, subscriber data, or additional forensic findings.

For now, the searches represent one element in a larger and still-developing case. Authorities continue to urge anyone with information about Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance to contact law enforcement.

As digital evidence becomes increasingly central to criminal investigations, the interpretation of search data requires careful analysis. Timing, context, and verification will ultimately determine whether the Arizona-based queries carry investigative weight.

The disappearance of Nancy Guthrie remains unresolved. Officials stress that confirmed facts — not online speculation — will guide the next phase of the investigation.