At exactly 11:47 PM on May 1st, 2025, a grainy security camera at a remote gas station quietly recorded what may become the most important moment in one of Canada’s most troubling missing persons cases.

According to confirmation from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the footage captures Daniel Martell making an unexplained midnight trip — the same night Lily Sullivan and Jack Sullivan vanished.

Martell had consistently maintained one position during questioning: he was home that night. But the camera, located roughly 30 kilometers away, tells a different story.

The CCTV footage, described by investigators as “flickering but clear enough,” shows a vehicle consistent with Martell’s traveling to the gas station shortly before midnight. While the footage does not capture any criminal act, it directly contradicts his statement and introduces a critical gap in the timeline.

That gap is now at the center of the investigation.

Investigators say the midnight trip matters not because of where Martell went, but because of when he went — and what he claimed afterward. In missing persons cases, inconsistencies in time are often the threads that unravel entire narratives.

RCMP sources confirm that the gas station footage was verified through digital forensic analysis. Time stamps were cross-checked, metadata reviewed, and the video synchronized with other known events from that night. The result: Martell’s alibi no longer holds.

This discovery prompted investigators to revisit earlier police interrogation tapes. In those recordings, Martell repeatedly stated he never left his residence. The contradiction between his statements and the video evidence has now elevated the midnight trip from curiosity to potential clue.

Authorities stress that confirmation of the trip does not, on its own, determine guilt. However, it raises questions that cannot be ignored: Why was Martell traveling at that hour? Why deny the trip entirely? And what happened during the period unaccounted for?

The disappearance of Lily and Jack Sullivan shocked communities across Canada. From the moment the siblings were reported missing, public attention intensified, vigils were held, and tips poured in. Yet despite extensive searches, answers remained elusive.

The newly confirmed CCTV footage has shifted focus from broad search efforts to a tighter examination of the timeline.

Digital forensic experts working with investigators are now mapping Martell’s movements before and after the 11:47 PM sighting. Cell phone data, vehicle telemetry where available, and surveillance cameras along potential routes are being analyzed to reconstruct the hours surrounding the disappearance.

Equally important are the interrogation tapes. Analysts note changes in Martell’s language, hesitations, and phrasing when questioned about that night. While such observations are not proof, they provide context that becomes significant when paired with physical evidence.

RCMP officials emphasize that this is a developing investigation. No charges have been announced, and Martell’s legal status has not been publicly altered. Still, the confirmation of the midnight trip represents the most concrete contradiction uncovered so far.

For the families of Lily and Jack, the revelation brings a mix of hope and anguish. Hope that the investigation is moving closer to answers. Anguish that those answers may confirm fears long held but never proven.

True-crime analysts often describe missing persons cases as puzzles built on absence. In this case, the absence of truth in one man’s account may prove more revealing than any single piece of physical evidence.

As investigators continue to close in on the timeline gap, one fact is now indisputable: Daniel Martell was not where he said he was.

And that may change everything.