In a case that continues to haunt Britain more than three decades after one of the most shocking crimes in modern history, the father of murdered toddler James Bulger has issued a bone-chilling warning about the man who killed his son. Ralph Bulger, speaking ahead of Jon Venables’ latest bid for freedom, declared: “If it wasn’t this child, it would have been another.” The statement underscores deep-seated fears that the killer remains a grave danger to society.

James Bulger, just two years old, was abducted from a shopping centre in Bootle, Merseyside, on February 12, 1993. He was lured away, tortured, and brutally murdered by two ten-year-old boys: Jon Venables and Robert Thompson. The crime, captured partially on CCTV, shocked the nation and sparked intense debate about youth justice, evil, and rehabilitation. Both boys were convicted and sentenced to detention at Her Majesty’s pleasure, later released on licence in 2001 with new identities after serving eight years.

While Thompson has since lived a low-profile life, Venables has repeatedly breached conditions and returned to prison multiple times — including for possessing indecent images of children. In 2023, the Parole Board rejected his release, concluding he still posed a risk to children and could reoffend. Now, in early 2026, Venables, aged 43, has been granted another full oral hearing before the Parole Board. The family of James Bulger was informed recently, with proceedings expected soon — possibly next month.

Ralph Bulger, now 59, has vowed to fight the release “until I breathe my last.” He plans to attend the hearing (via video link or in writing) to deliver an impact statement, ensuring Venables hears the lifelong devastation inflicted on his family. “I will stand at the hearing for my son James,” Ralph said, “for my enduring love for him, for justice for him, and in defiance of Jon Venables.” He has described the killer as a “monster” and a “ticking time bomb,” insisting that freedom would endanger other innocent children.

James’ mother, Denise Fergus, shares similar concerns, warning the board about what a “bigger and stronger” Venables could do outside prison’s “protection.” The family has endured repeated trauma each time Venables seeks parole, reopening wounds from the unimaginable loss. Supporters argue the original sentence reflected the killers’ young age at the time, allowing for rehabilitation. Critics, including the Bulger family, contend that repeated breaches prove rehabilitation has failed.

The upcoming hearing revives painful memories of Britain’s youngest murderers and questions whether true change is possible in such extreme cases. For Ralph Bulger, the message is stark: releasing Venables risks history repeating itself. “He will kill again,” he has warned. As the Parole Board weighs risk against rehabilitation, the nation watches once more, haunted by a toddler’s tragic fate and a father’s unyielding quest for justice.