🚨 “THIS IS MY DEEPEST FEAR” – HEARTBREAKING WORDS FROM JAMES BULGER’S MUM! 😢

After 30+ years of unimaginable pain, Denise Fergus bravely opens up about the nightmare that haunts her: facing her son’s ki-ller, Jon Venables, in person for the first time. The sound of his voice alone could unleash fury she’s buried for decades… What if she can’t hold back? What if the rage takes over in that secret room? This raw confession amid his latest parole bid is shattering – and it’s forcing everyone to ask: Is justice ever truly served? The emotional truth will hit you hard… 👀 Don’t scroll past – read the devastating details now before they pull it down!

Denise Fergus, the mother of murdered toddler James Bulger, has shared a profoundly personal revelation about the emotional toll of confronting one of her son’s killers, Jon Venables, amid his latest bid for freedom. In interviews with outlets including The Mirror and Liverpool Echo published in mid-January 2026, Fergus described her “deepest fear” as the uncertainty of how she will react when hearing Venables’ voice for the first time in over three decades during an upcoming Parole Board hearing. The comments come as the family braces for yet another chapter in a case that has gripped Britain since 1993, highlighting ongoing debates about rehabilitation, victim rights, and the long shadow cast by one of the country’s most notorious crimes.

The murder of James Bulger remains etched in public memory as a tragedy that shocked the nation. On February 12, 1993, the two-year-old was abducted from the New Strand Shopping Centre in Bootle, Merseyside, by two 10-year-old boys: Jon Venables and Robert Thompson. CCTV footage captured the boys leading the toddler away by the hand, a haunting image that played a pivotal role in their identification and subsequent trial. James was taken to a remote railway line, where he was tortured – beaten with bricks, batteries, and an iron bar – before being placed on the tracks and killed by an oncoming train. The brutality of the crime, committed by children, led to widespread outrage and calls for changes in how juvenile offenders are handled.

Venables and Thompson were convicted of murder in November 1993, becoming the youngest murderers in modern British legal history. They served eight years in secure facilities before being released on licence in 2001 with new identities under strict anonymity orders intended to protect them from vigilante justice. While Thompson has maintained a low profile with no reported further offenses, Venables has been recalled to prison multiple times for serious breaches. In 2010 and 2017, he was convicted of possessing indecent images of children, including in one instance a “paedophile manual.” These offenses led to additional prison terms, with his most recent recall following the 2017 conviction.

The Parole Board rejected Venables’ previous bid for release in 2023, citing ongoing risks to public safety, particularly to children, and his failure to demonstrate sufficient change. However, in early 2026, reports from the BBC, The Mirror, and other sources confirmed that Venables, now 43, had been granted a new oral hearing – his first in-person or video-linked appearance in years. The decision was communicated to James Bulger’s family, including Denise Fergus, who applied for and was granted permission to observe the proceedings via video link from a secure location. This marks a significant development: Fergus will hear Venables speak directly, potentially for the first time since his childhood trial.

In an exclusive interview with The Mirror on January 14, 2026, Fergus, now 57, expressed a mix of anger, distress, and apprehension. “Until I’m in the room I don’t know how I’ll react, whether fury will rise in me at the sound of him, because it’s the first hearing I’ve ever attended,” she said. She described the prospect as her “deepest fear,” underscoring the emotional unpredictability of the moment after decades of suppressed trauma. Fergus has prepared a victim impact statement for the board, warning that a released Venables would be “bigger and stronger” than the child who committed the crime, and questioning what he might do outside the confines – and “protection” – of prison. Her spokeswoman, Kym Morris, told media that the family had hoped for a “redirection” without a full hearing to spare further distress, but the granting of the process has reopened “unimaginable trauma.”

The hearing’s timing adds another layer of anguish. While no exact date has been publicly confirmed by the Parole Board, concerns have been raised that it could coincide with or approach the anniversary of James’s abduction on February 12. Fergus and her former husband, Ralph Bulger, have voiced frustration over the repeated cycle of parole applications, which forces the family to relive the horror periodically. In statements reported by The Sun and other outlets, the parents emphasized the prolonged uncertainty and the emotional burden on victims’ families in such cases.

Fergus has long been an advocate for stronger victim protections and has campaigned against the spread of distressing material related to her son’s murder online. In her 2018 memoir, “I Let Him Go,” she detailed the guilt and haunting memories that followed James’s death, including the agonizing thought that he might have called for her in his final moments. She has consistently opposed vigilantism and calls for the killers’ deaths, stating in past interviews that she does not want “blood on my hands.” Yet she remains firm that Venables poses an ongoing danger, pointing to his criminal history post-release as evidence that rehabilitation efforts have fallen short.

Public and media discourse around the case remains deeply divided. Supporters of Fergus argue that the parole system’s focus on offender rehabilitation sometimes overlooks the lifelong impact on victims, with repeated hearings serving as a form of secondary victimization. Critics of indefinite detention for juvenile offenders highlight the principle that children can change, though Venables’ record complicates that view. The anonymity order, while upheld to prevent harm to Venables, has faced criticism for shielding him from full public accountability, especially given breaches and ongoing offenses.

The Parole Board’s decisions are based on comprehensive risk assessments, including input from psychologists, probation services, and prison staff. Release requires evidence that the individual no longer poses a significant danger and has addressed underlying issues. In Venables’ prior denials, the board cited persistent concerns over his sexual interest in children and potential for reoffending. If the current hearing results in another rejection, it would align with that pattern; approval, however, would spark intense backlash given the family’s statements and public sentiment.

For Denise Fergus, the process is more than legal – it is deeply personal. Her willingness to attend the hearing, despite the fear of her own reaction, reflects a commitment to ensuring her son’s memory and the risks he represents are not forgotten. As she prepares for what could be a pivotal moment, her words serve as a stark reminder of the enduring human cost of crime. Whether this latest parole bid brings closure or continued uncertainty, the case of James Bulger continues to provoke questions about justice, forgiveness, and the boundaries of second chances in a society still grappling with its darkest chapter.