🚨 CHILLING TWIST: Kidnappers DON’T Want the $6 Million Bitcoin… They Want REVENGE – And It’s Tied to Savannah Guthrie’s Past! 🚨

Ransom notes flying to media outlets, deadlines ticking down to Monday 5 p.m., family begging “we will pay”… but experts are screaming: This isn’t about money at all 👇

As the investigation into the disappearance of 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie continues, former law enforcement officials and criminal profilers have raised questions about whether the motive extends beyond financial gain, pointing instead to potential revenge, obsession, or a personal vendetta possibly connected to her daughter, NBC “Today” show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie.

Nancy Guthrie vanished from her Catalina Foothills home near Tucson after being dropped off by son-in-law Tommaso Cioni on January 31. Blood evidence on the front porch, confirmed by DNA to be hers, shifted the case to a criminal abduction. Authorities have not identified suspects, persons of interest, or vehicles, and the Pima County Sheriff’s Department, with FBI assistance, continues processing leads.

Multiple ransom notes have demanded millions in Bitcoin, with escalating figures reaching $6 million and a deadline of 5 p.m. local time on Monday, February 9. Notes sent to media outlets like KGUN9 and others referenced specific details, including items at the scene such as an Apple Watch and floodlight. One earlier demand was confirmed as a hoax, leading to the arrest of Derrick Callella on federal charges.

Despite the financial demands, several former FBI agents have expressed skepticism that money is the primary goal. Tracy Walder, a former CIA member and FBI special agent who contributes to NewsNation, told Page Six that the abduction may be linked more closely to Savannah Guthrie than to financial motives. “I am not convinced it’s fully about money,” Walder said. “Her salary is for the most part public, but there are other people who make more money than she does.” Walder theorized it could involve someone with an “obsession” with Savannah due to her high profile or a “beef” stemming from stories she covered or interviews conducted.

James Gagliano, a former FBI supervisor and crisis negotiation expert, told Fox & Friends that kidnappings typically fall into two categories: profit or revenge. While the ransom note represents the “most compelling piece of evidence thus far,” Gagliano suggested revenge could be a factor, especially given the unusual aspects of the case.

Other analysts have noted deviations from traditional kidnapping-for-ransom patterns. Former FBI special agent Tom Baker, appearing on “Jesse Watters Primetime,” described the case as “a little different” from standard abductions. He highlighted the lack of swift, direct demands and the public nature of some communications. Retired NYPD Inspector Paul Mauro told Fox News that the elusiveness in communications might stem from an inability to provide proof of life, implying the abductor may not have leverage to negotiate.

Security experts have pointed to the timeline as inconsistent with a profit-driven kidnapping. One analyst noted that spending up to 45 minutes inside the home—based on the period from doorbell camera disconnection at 1:47 a.m. to pacemaker communication ceasing at 2:28 a.m.—seems excessive for someone primarily seeking quick financial gain. In such scenarios, perpetrators typically aim to minimize exposure time.

Online discussions on platforms like Reddit have echoed these doubts. Threads in communities such as r/UnsolvedMysteries and r/MissingPersons speculate that the ransom notes could serve as a diversion or that the motive involves something beyond money, such as personal ties or a cover for another crime. Some users suggest the perpetrator may have familiarity with the family or home, given the apparent comfort during the extended time inside.

Family members have continued public appeals. In a video released February 7, Savannah Guthrie appeared with siblings Annie and Camron, stating they are prepared to pay and urging contact with proof of life. “This is the only way we will have peace,” Savannah said. Authorities have indicated possible “backdoor communication” with potential abductors, though details remain confidential.

The absence of proof-of-life evidence has fueled concern. Experts note that legitimate kidnappers seeking ransom typically provide verifiable signs the victim is alive to encourage payment. Delays and the public dissemination of notes to media rather than direct family channels have been described as atypical.

Sheriff Chris Nanos has stated investigators are “actively looking at everyone” as potential suspects and have not ruled out any possibilities. No motive has been officially confirmed, and officials emphasize the ongoing nature of the probe. A $50,000 reward persists for information leading to Nancy Guthrie’s safe return or related arrests.

Nancy Guthrie requires daily medication for heart conditions, high blood pressure, and a pacemaker, raising fears about her well-being without access to care. The property’s remote location and lack of immediate witnesses complicate the investigation, though extensive searches—including at family residences—have occurred.

Broader context from former agents like Brad Garrett suggests the perpetrator likely had prior knowledge of the home or family routines. While financial targeting due to Savannah’s celebrity status remains possible, ideological or personal motives appear less likely based on available details, though not entirely dismissed.

The case has drawn comparisons to rare high-profile abductions, reviving discussions about risks to families of public figures. Unlike historical cases driven purely by profit, such as the Patty Hearst or J. Paul Getty III kidnappings, this one features elements that experts say warrant scrutiny of non-monetary angles.

As deadlines approach and evidence continues to be analyzed, law enforcement urges the public to submit tips to (520) 351-4900. No arrests connected to the disappearance have been announced beyond the hoax perpetrator, and officials plan press conferences for major developments.

Whether the motive proves to be financial, vengeful, or otherwise, the focus remains on locating Nancy Guthrie and understanding the circumstances of her disappearance. The blend of public ransom communications, expert skepticism, and family pleas underscores the complexity of the case as it enters its second week.