“I WILL FIGHT HIM UNTIL I BREATHE MY LAST.” — James Bulger’s father Ralph breaks his silence after Jon Venables seeks parole release again 💔😱

For the first time in years, Ralph has spoken out with raw determination, vowing to attend the hearing and confront Venables directly about the lifelong devastation he caused.

But it’s the disturbing detail Ralph reveals about Venables behind bars that has left the public stunned, reigniting Britain’s deepest nightmare…

Ralph warns that Venables remains a serious threat even in prison—more dangerous now than ever—and must stay locked up to protect innocent families. He plans to stand there “for my enduring love for James, for justice for him, and in defiance of Jon Venables.”

Full details:

Ralph Bulger, father of murdered toddler James Bulger, has broken his silence with a powerful vow to oppose the latest parole bid by one of his son’s killers, Jon Venables. In an interview with The Sun on January 15, 2026, Ralph declared his intention to participate in the upcoming Parole Board oral hearing, emphasizing his resolve to ensure Venables understands the enduring impact of the 1993 crime.

“I will stand at the hearing for my son James,” Ralph stated. “For my enduring love for him, for justice for him and in defiance of Jon Venables.” He added that he would make certain Venables hears “the devastating impact and pain he has caused to me and my family for 33 years.” Ralph’s comments highlight a father’s unyielding commitment to advocating for his son’s memory amid proceedings that repeatedly reopen family trauma.

James Bulger, two years old, was abducted from the New Strand Shopping Centre in Bootle, Merseyside, on February 12, 1993, by Venables and Robert Thompson, both aged 10. The boys were convicted of murder in November 1993—the youngest in modern British history—and sentenced to detention at Her Majesty’s pleasure. They served eight years before being released on license in 2001 with new identities protected by a lifelong anonymity injunction.

Venables, now 43, has been recalled to prison twice post-release: in 2010 and 2017 after possessing indecent images of children, serving further custodial terms each time. His 2023 parole application was denied due to ongoing public safety risks and insufficient candour with probation professionals. The Parole Board confirmed the new oral hearing in January 2026, following Venables’ decision not to pursue a paper-based review in 2023.

Ralph’s latest statements include a stark warning about Venables’ continued threat level, even while incarcerated. He described Venables as posing greater danger today than in the past, suggesting that release would endanger unsuspecting communities due to the anonymity order shielding his identity. Ralph stressed the need to keep Venables behind bars to safeguard innocent families, framing the issue as one of public protection rather than retribution.

Both Ralph and ex-wife Denise Fergus have been granted permission to submit victim personal statements and observe the hearing (with Venables’ face obscured to preserve anonymity). Denise has expressed similar anguish, noting the process forces confrontation with “unimaginable trauma” and uncertainty. A spokesperson for her indicated hope for an outcome that might allow some peace, though the decision to proceed has intensified family distress.

Ralph has long critiqued elements of the case, including the anonymity injunction and perceived prioritization of offender rehabilitation over victims’ ongoing suffering. He unsuccessfully challenged the order in 2019, arguing for greater transparency. In earlier comments, he highlighted how anonymity leaves communities unaware of potential risks.

The development has reignited national debate on juvenile justice, post-release monitoring, and victim rights. Venables’ repeated offenses involving child imagery have raised persistent concerns about risk management. Thompson has remained low-profile since 2001 with no further convictions.

Denise Fergus advances child safety through the James Bulger Memorial Trust, funding anti-bullying, abuse prevention, and bereavement support programs. She has campaigned against disturbing online recreations tied to the case and engaged with officials for stronger safeguards.

Ralph’s pledge to “fight until I breathe my last” underscores parental grief’s permanence. He intends to deliver his impact statement—likely via video or writing—to ensure Venables grasps the consequences. The hearing, expected early 2026, may align with anniversaries like James’ abduction date (February 12) or birthday (March 16).

The Bulger family’s sorrow endures. Ralph and Denise divorced in 1995 amid grief’s toll, yet both remain focused on James’ legacy. Public opinion frequently supports them, with calls for enhanced victim protections and stricter conditions on high-risk offenders.

The Parole Board bases decisions on public protection, reviewing evidence from prison staff, probation, psychiatrists, and victim statements. Prior denials cited ongoing risks, including sexual preoccupation and dishonesty.

As proceedings near, Ralph Bulger’s words highlight core tensions: rehabilitation for a former child offender versus justice, transparency, and peace for victims’ families. Each review revives pain without final closure.

The James Bulger case remains a landmark for youth crime policy, anonymity, and long-term victim needs. Regardless of outcome, Ralph’s determination persists—fighting for his son and a system that better honors those left behind.