🚨 PARLIAMENT ERUPTS: Pierre Poilievre Just DELIVERED A BRUTAL, No-Holds-Barred Takedown on Mark Carney – Exposing Trudeau’s Pipeline Lies That Cost Canada BILLIONS and Left Us Begging the U.S. for Scraps! 😡 Carney sat speechless as Poilievre hammered home the hypocrisy: promising pipelines to “build Canada strong” while Liberals vote AGAINST their own deals and block real energy independence. Is this the moment the Liberal throne CRACKS wide open? Former supporters are furious – watch the savage clip that’s lighting up Canada before Carney’s team scrubs it! You NEED to see this demolition derby LIVE – click NOW and share if you’re DONE with the broken promises! 🔥🇨🇦

In a heated exchange that has reignited debates over Canada’s energy future, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre launched a pointed attack on Prime Minister Mark Carney during question period in the House of Commons, accusing the Liberal government of perpetuating the same anti-pipeline stance that defined the Justin Trudeau years. Poilievre demanded immediate action on a new West Coast pipeline, claiming Carney’s administration is dodging responsibility and betraying commitments made in a high-profile memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Alberta. The confrontation, captured on video and widely shared on social media, left observers describing Carney as momentarily “speechless” amid the barrage of accusations.

The exchange stems from ongoing tensions over energy infrastructure. In late November 2025, Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith signed an MOU committing both levels of government to advance a new oil or natural gas pipeline to British Columbia’s Pacific coast, potentially routing 300,000 to 400,000 barrels per day to Asian markets. The deal was framed as a step toward diversifying exports away from U.S. dependency, especially amid trade pressures from President Donald Trump’s administration. It included provisions to amend or lift aspects of the northern tanker moratorium if needed, and it signaled a retreat from a proposed federal emissions cap on the oil and gas sector.

Yet, when Poilievre introduced an opposition day motion in early December 2025 – using language directly pulled from the MOU to declare support for such a pipeline – the Liberals voted it down 139-196. Poilievre seized on the defeat, arguing it exposed Carney’s “talk out of both sides of his mouth.” In Parliament, he pressed the prime minister on why his government would sign a deal with Alberta only to oppose its core elements in the House. “How can Canadians believe your words if you’re willing to vote against them?” Poilievre asked, according to reports from the session. Carney responded by emphasizing a broader vision: “It’s not just the pipeline. It’s pathways, industrial carbon pricing, methane reductions, net-zero by 2050 – building Alberta strong, Canada strong.” He noted omissions in the Conservative motion but stopped short of committing to override provincial or Indigenous objections.

Poilievre has repeatedly tied Carney’s current position to Trudeau-era decisions, including the 2016 cancellation of the Northern Gateway pipeline – a project Carney, in his pre-political role, had testified against on environmental and commercial grounds. Conservative posts on social media highlight old clips of Carney calling pipelines “so boring” or downplaying their importance, contrasting them with his recent pledges. “Liberals blocked Canadian oil for a decade,” Poilievre stated in one widely viewed video. “While U.S. oil ships to 2.5 billion Asian customers, we’re forced to sell at a discount.” He has accused Carney of giving veto power to British Columbia Premier David Eby and failing to use federal authority under the Constitution to approve interprovincial projects.

The backdrop includes broader economic challenges. Canada’s oil exports remain heavily reliant on the U.S., often at discounted prices due to limited access to global markets. The Trans Mountain expansion, completed under Trudeau, has boosted some shipments to Asia, but critics argue more pipelines are needed for true diversification. Carney’s government has launched initiatives like the Major Projects Office to fast-track “nation-building” infrastructure and the Building Canada Act to streamline approvals. Yet, environmental rollbacks in the Alberta MOU – including dropping the emissions cap and relaxing clean electricity rules – drew backlash from within Liberal ranks. Former Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault resigned over concerns that climate commitments were being dismantled.

Poilievre’s strategy appears aimed at exposing perceived Liberal divisions. A Calgary Liberal MP indicated opposition to the pipeline motion, prompting Poilievre to accuse the party of betraying the city’s energy sector. Social media amplified the drama, with clips of Poilievre “cornering” Carney garnering thousands of views. One post described Carney as “shaking” and refusing direct answers, while supporters praised Poilievre for “destroying” the prime minister’s credibility.

Carney’s defenders point to a balanced approach. The prime minister has reaffirmed net-zero goals by 2050 while promoting Canada as an “energy superpower” in both clean and conventional sources. In speeches, he has stressed consultation with provinces, territories, and Indigenous groups – a process he says is essential for any project. During a B.C. visit, Carney met with Coastal First Nations to discuss energy corridors, emphasizing “social acceptance.” The MOU sets a July 2026 deadline for pipeline proposals to the Major Projects Office, suggesting progress rather than paralysis.

Critics from industry and conservative circles argue Carney inherited and has failed to fully unwind Trudeau’s regulatory burdens, such as Bill C-69 (often called the “no more pipelines act”) and the tanker ban. A Fraser Institute commentary noted that Carney’s first budget largely stuck to prior policies, strengthening industrial carbon pricing while scrapping the consumer version. Energy experts warn that even with political will, new pipelines face years of regulatory, environmental, and legal hurdles – including Indigenous consultations and potential court challenges.

The parliamentary clash reflects deeper fault lines in Canadian politics. Poilievre continues to push an “unleash the energy sector” message, vowing to repeal barriers and “legalize” pipelines for faster development. Carney counters that sustainable growth requires environmental safeguards and international partnerships, including trade diversification with China and India amid U.S. tensions.

As Parliament continues, the pipeline debate shows no signs of cooling. With potential elections looming and economic pressures mounting, Poilievre’s aggressive tactics aim to portray Carney as continuing Trudeau’s legacy of delays and broken promises. Whether this translates into voter backlash or forces concrete action remains uncertain, but the session has underscored one reality: energy policy remains one of the most divisive issues facing the nation.