In a heartbreaking case that has gripped North Dakota, the mother of 6-year-old Katarina Louthain, who was killed in a June 2024 rear-end collision near the Grand Forks International Airport, has taken bold legal action. Nicole Louthain, who was seriously injured in the same crash while driving her daughter home from an activity, recently filed a motion requesting the recusal of the presiding judge in the criminal proceedings against 44-year-old Travis Dean Bell of Fordville.

Bell faces charges of criminal vehicular homicide and criminal vehicular injury, stemming from the incident on Highway 2 where his vehicle allegedly struck the Louthains’ car at a stoplight. Authorities suspected impairment, leading to a chemical breath test that showed elevated blood alcohol levels. The case has been marked by intense evidentiary disputes.

Initially, in March 2025, Grand Forks District Court Judge Theodore Sandberg ruled in favor of the defense, suppressing the breath test results on grounds that they were illegally obtained and not voluntary. This decision dealt a blow to the prosecution and sparked outrage from Katarina’s family, who argued it allowed a potential technicality to overshadow justice for their daughter. Nicole Louthain publicly criticized the ruling and the judge’s background, calling for impartiality.

The tide turned dramatically when the North Dakota Supreme Court, in a December 2025 unanimous decision, reversed the suppression order. The high court found that the lower court had misapplied the law regarding implied consent and voluntary submission to the test. All five justices agreed that Bell had been properly informed and consented, reinstating the critical evidence. This paved the way for the trial to proceed in Grand Forks County, with a start date set for January 27, 2026.

Despite this setback for the defense, the mother’s latest move to recuse the judge signals deep concerns over perceived bias or procedural fairness. The filing highlights how the case’s twists— from evidence suppression to Supreme Court intervention—have kept the family in prolonged anguish. Katarina, remembered by her parents as a bright, active child involved in numerous activities, became a symbol of the devastating consequences of alleged impaired driving.

The Louthains have been vocal advocates for stricter drunk driving laws in North Dakota since the tragedy. Nicole, who survived severe injuries, has shared her grief publicly, emphasizing the preventable nature of the crash. With the breath test now admissible, prosecutors appear strengthened, but the recusal request introduces fresh uncertainty. If granted, a new judge could reshape trial dynamics; if denied, the case moves forward under the current bench.

As the January trial looms, this high-stakes legal battle underscores the emotional toll on grieving families and the complexities of proving impairment-related fatalities in court. The outcome could influence similar cases statewide, highlighting the balance between defendants’ rights and justice for victims.