In the heated aftermath of Monday night’s Super Bowl press conference, Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce made headlines by publicly backing NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell on one of the most divisive decisions in recent league history: inviting Puerto Rican superstar Bad Bunny to headline the halftime show for Super Bowl LX in 2026.

Bad Bunny, the global reggaeton sensation behind massive hits like “Tití Me Preguntó,” was announced as the performer months ago, sparking immediate backlash. Critics, including some high-profile voices, slammed the choice, arguing it didn’t align with traditional Super Bowl vibes, raised concerns over language barriers with mostly Spanish lyrics, and even tied into broader political debates after Bad Bunny’s outspoken comments against ICE policies at recent awards shows. NFL owners reportedly expressed private unease, fearing it could impact viewership or sponsorship deals in a polarized climate.

Despite the storm, Goodell stood firm, defending the pick as a bold move to unite diverse audiences and showcase global talent. Enter Travis Kelce, the league’s charismatic star whose every word carries weight thanks to his on-field dominance and off-field romance with Taylor Swift.

Right after the media session, Kelce voiced strong support for Goodell’s vision. Sources close to the situation say he praised the commissioner’s courage in embracing cultural shifts, calling it a step toward making the NFL more inclusive and appealing to younger, international fans. Kelce reportedly highlighted Bad Bunny’s massive streaming numbers and crossover appeal, suggesting the performance could draw record audiences from Latin America and beyond.

But here’s where it gets shocking: that single act of loyalty allegedly came at a steep personal price. Insiders claim Kelce lost out on a staggering $70 million opportunity tied to potential endorsement deals, sponsorship alignments, or even betting-related ventures that clashed with the controversy. The figure—whether from lost brand partnerships wary of the backlash or other high-stakes financial plays—has fueled speculation that standing by Goodell and the league’s direction wasn’t without sacrifice.

Kelce, known for his bold personality and willingness to speak out, has navigated controversies before, but this one hits different. With Super Bowl LX just days away at Levi’s Stadium, all eyes are on whether Bad Bunny’s show delivers the “huge party” he promised or amplifies the divide. Will the performance silence doubters with electrifying energy, or will the political undertones overshadow the spectacle?

For now, Kelce’s stance has only intensified the conversation. In a league where image and money intertwine, his decision to back Goodell shows loyalty—but at what ultimate cost? Fans are divided, debates rage online, and the countdown to kickoff has never felt more electric. One thing’s clear: this halftime choice isn’t just about music; it’s about the future of the NFL itself.