🚨 “JUSTICE, AT LAST.” — After 30 Years of Heartbreak, James Bulger’s Mum Finally Gets the News She’s Prayed For… But Is It Really Over? 😱

For three agonizing decades, Denise has fought tooth and nail, reliving the unimaginable horror every time this killer — now 43 — dares to beg for release. He’s been given new identities, walked free TWICE before, only to be hauled back behind bars for sickening child abuse images. And now… the board says NO. He still poses a danger. He could strike again.

But wait — whispers are swirling. Another hearing is looming. Could this “victory” be snatched away? Is Denise truly getting peace, or is the nightmare about to restart?

Read more:

More than three decades after the brutal murder of toddler James Bulger shocked Britain and the world, his mother, Denise Fergus, has publicly expressed a sense of hard-won relief following repeated denials of parole for one of the killers. The phrase “Justice, at last,” attributed to Fergus in various social media posts and reports, underscores the enduring pain of a case that continues to divide opinion on rehabilitation, public safety, and the limits of mercy for juvenile offenders.

The crime occurred on February 12, 1993, in Bootle, Merseyside. Two-year-old James Bulger wandered away from his mother in a shopping center. He was abducted by two 10-year-old boys, Jon Venables and Robert Thompson. CCTV footage captured the moment James was led away by the hand — images that remain seared into public memory. The boys took James on a two-and-a-half-mile walk, during which he was tortured, beaten with bricks and an iron bar, and sexually assaulted. His body was left on railway tracks, where it was struck by a train. The discovery horrified the nation, sparking widespread debate about childhood violence, parenting, and the justice system.

Venables and Thompson were tried as adults in an unprecedented move, convicted of murder, and sentenced to be detained at Her Majesty’s pleasure — the juvenile equivalent of a life sentence. They served eight years in secure facilities before being released on license in 2001 with new identities to protect them from vigilante attacks. The decision drew fierce criticism from some quarters, including Fergus, who argued the killers had not served sufficient time for such a heinous act.

Thompson, widely regarded as the less dominant of the pair during the crime, has not reoffended since his release and has largely stayed out of the public eye. Reports suggest he has rebuilt his life quietly, with some accounts describing him as having expressed remorse and benefited from rehabilitation.

Venables’ path has been far more troubled. In 2010, he was recalled to prison after child abuse images were found on his computer. He was released again in 2013 but returned to custody in 2017 for similar offenses involving indecent images of children. These convictions extended his time behind bars and reinforced concerns about his risk to the public.

The Parole Board has reviewed Venables’ case multiple times. In December 2023, after a two-day hearing — held partly in private at Venables’ request to avoid contact with James Bulger’s family — the board denied release. The panel concluded that Venables still posed a risk, particularly to children, and that release “would not be safe for the protection of the public.” This decision was welcomed by Fergus and her supporters, who saw it as acknowledgment that the original crime’s gravity outweighed considerations of rehabilitation for this offender.

Recent reports from January 2026 indicate the Parole Board has granted Venables another oral hearing, scheduled for the coming month. Fergus has been informed and granted permission to observe via video link — a first in allowing her some direct involvement, though Venables’ identity remains protected. A spokesperson for Fergus described the process as forcing her to confront “unimaginable trauma” anew. She has voiced fears about what a now-adult Venables, described as “bigger and stronger,” might do if freed from prison’s “protection.”

Fergus, now in her late 50s, has campaigned tirelessly for changes in how such cases are handled. She has called for longer minimum terms for child murderers and greater transparency in parole decisions. In interviews, she has said the repeated hearings feel like punishment for her family rather than the perpetrator. “I feel like I’m the one in prison, not him,” she told one outlet recently.

The case has prompted ongoing legal and societal debate. Supporters of the current system argue that juvenile offenders, even in grave cases, deserve opportunities for reform, citing psychological evidence that young brains can change. Critics, including many in the public and some politicians, contend that certain crimes are so egregious that lifelong incarceration or stricter supervision is warranted. Petitions and parliamentary discussions have called for public inquiries into the handling of the Bulger murder, though progress has been slow due to sub judice rules during active parole proceedings.

The Ministry of Justice maintains that parole decisions are independent and based on rigorous risk assessments. Venables remains under a life license, meaning any release would include strict conditions, monitoring, and the possibility of immediate recall for breaches.

As the latest hearing approaches, Fergus’s statements highlight the human cost of a crime that never fades from memory. For many, the Bulger case symbolizes the tension between justice for victims and the potential for redemption. Whether “justice at last” proves enduring or temporary depends on the Parole Board’s forthcoming decision — one that will once again place a grieving mother’s words at the center of national attention.